Far-Right
Techno-Fascism
Dystopia that combines the totalitarian authoritarianism of fascism with digital surveillance, artificial intelligence, and technological control of the masses, using technique to repress, manipulate, and dominate all of society.
I want a totalitarian state that uses digital surveillance and artificial intelligence to repress, manipulate and dominate all of society.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
48.8pt
Representation
10% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.
Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?
46.0pt
Diplomacy
91.2% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.
When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?
42.8pt
Immigration
92.5% Assimilation, compared with the ideology catalog’s 49.75% median.
How should a society approach migration and cultural difference?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 11.2% Federal, 88.8% Unitary (Very strong Unitary); Representation: 10% Democracy, 90% Autocracy (Very strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Techno-Fascism sits 47.5 points below it. 100 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 92.5% Security, 7.5% Liberty (Very strong Security); Immigration: 92.5% Assimilation, 7.5% Multiculturalism (Very strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Techno-Fascism sits 33.7 points above it. 95 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 91.2% Militarist, 8.8% Pacifist (Very strong Militarist); Intervention: 13.8% Non-interventionist, 86.2% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Techno-Fascism sits 35.0 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 47.5% Public, 52.5% Private (Balanced); Control: 77.5% Planning, 22.5% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 82.5% Protectionism, 17.5% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Techno-Fascism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Techno-Fascism sits 5.7 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 63.7% Irreligious, 36.3% Religious (Leaning Irreligious); Morality: 17.5% Progressive, 82.5% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Techno-Fascism sits 21.3 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 87.5% Technology, 12.5% Biology (Very strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Techno-Fascism, the 37.5-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Techno-Fascism sits 30.0 points above it. 19 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
National Socialism
96.3% compatibility
Fascism
95.1% compatibility
Red Fascism
93.6% compatibility
Ba'athist Socialism
93.1% compatibility
National Bolshevism (NazBol)
92.1% compatibility
Archeofuturism
91.9% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Techno-Fascism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Techno-Fascism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Techno-Fascism.
Which ideology is closest to Techno-Fascism?
National Socialism has 96.3% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Techno-Fascism?
Power is among the furthest from the center: 92.5% Security and 7.5% Liberty. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.





