Far-Right

Militarism

Regime centered on the armed forces as the core of political power, ruled by a military junta or command hierarchy, marked by centralization, discipline, a cult of order, and expansionism, subordinating civilian politics to military command.

I want a military junta commanding the state, discipline and a cult of order in the barracks, subordinating civilian politics to military command.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 8.8%91.2% Unitary
Democracy 17.5%82.5% Autocracy
Security 83.8%16.2% Liberty
Assimilation 77.5%22.5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 86.2%13.8% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 13.8%86.2% Nationalist
Public 38.8%61.2% Private
Planning 62.5%37.5% Free market
Protectionism 71.2%28.8% Globalism
Irreligious 35%65% Religious
Progressive 25%75% Traditionalist
Technology 57.5%42.5% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

41.3pt

Representation

17.5% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.

Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?

41.0pt

Diplomacy

86.2% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.

When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?

38.7pt

Intervention

13.8% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.

How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 8.8% Federal, 91.2% Unitary (Very strong Unitary); Representation: 17.5% Democracy, 82.5% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Militarism sits 40.0 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 83.8% Security, 16.2% Liberty (Strong Security); Immigration: 77.5% Assimilation, 22.5% Multiculturalism (Strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Militarism sits 25.0 points above it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 86.2% Militarist, 13.8% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 13.8% Non-interventionist, 86.2% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Militarism sits 35.0 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 38.8% Public, 61.2% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 62.5% Planning, 37.5% Free market (Leaning Planning); Trade: 71.2% Protectionism, 28.8% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Militarism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Militarism sits 14.4 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 35% Irreligious, 65% Religious (Leaning Religious); Morality: 25% Progressive, 75% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Militarism sits 13.8 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 57.5% Technology, 42.5% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Militarism, the 7.5-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Militarism sits 0.0 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

At the other end of the catalog

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Militarism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Militarism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Militarism.

Which ideology is closest to Militarism?

Imperialism has 98.6% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Militarism?

Structure is among the furthest from the center: 8.8% Federal and 91.2% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test